Find The cost to build Pervious Pavement

Get a quote for your spesific project for local contractors here:

The initial cost of  pervious pavemen is a primary consideration for developers, municipalities, and homeowners looking to implement sustainable paving solutions.

This guide provides an in-depth look at the various factors influencing the cost of pervious pavement, its long-term economic benefits, and strategies to make it a financially sound choice for your project.

Design

Pervious pavement, also known as permeable pavement or porous pavement, is a specially designed paving surface that allows water to infiltrate through its structure into the underlying soil or sub-base layers. Unlike traditional asphalt or concrete which create impervious surfaces leading to stormwater runoff, pervious systems help manage stormwater at its source. This infiltration process reduces runoff volume, filters pollutants, and recharges groundwater.

Benefits of Pervious Pavement:

• Stormwater Management: Significantly reduces runoff, mitigating flooding and erosion.
• Improved Water Quality: Filters pollutants like oils and heavy metals from water as it passes through.
• Groundwater Recharge: Replenishes local aquifers.
• Reduced Heat Island Effect: Lighter-colored and porous surfaces absorb less heat.
• Potential for Cost Savings: Can reduce or eliminate the need for conventional drainage systems (e.g., pipes, retention ponds).
• Environmental Compliance: Helps meet local stormwater regulations and can contribute to green building certifications like LEED.

Types and Their Initial Costs

Several types of pervious pavement are available, each with distinct characteristics, applications, and associated costs. The “Porous Paving” term often used generally can refer to porous asphalt or other aggregate-based systems. Here’s a more specific breakdown:

Pervious Concrete

• Overview: A mixture of cement, coarse aggregate, water, and admixtures, creating a highly porous structure with interconnected voids (typically 15-25%) that allow water to pass through.
• Pros (Cost & Performance): Durable, good for moderate traffic, can be light-colored reducing heat absorption.
• Cons (Cost & Performance): Installation requires certified contractors, can be prone to clogging without proper maintenance, potentially higher material cost than some options.
• Typical Applications: Parking lots, sidewalks, pedestrian plazas, low-volume roads.
• Material Cost: Approximately $2.50 – $6.00 per square foot. Specialized aggregates or colors can increase this.
• Installation Cost: Approximately $4.00 – $10.00 per square foot, influenced by sub-base preparation and project complexity.
• Typical Lifespan: 15-30 years with proper maintenance.

Porous Asphalt

• Overview: Similar to traditional asphalt but with reduced fine aggregates, creating interconnected voids that allow water to percolate.
• Pros (Cost & Performance): Can be more flexible than pervious concrete, good noise reduction, familiar installation techniques for asphalt contractors (though specialized knowledge is needed). Often uses recycled asphalt content.
• Cons (Cost & Performance): Can be susceptible to clogging, may require specialized maintenance equipment, darker color absorbs more heat than concrete.
• Typical Applications: Parking areas, driveways, bike paths, low-traffic roads.
• Material Cost: Approximately $2.00 – $5.00 per square foot.
• Installation Cost: Approximately $3.00 – $8.00 per square foot.
• Typical Lifespan: 10-20 years, dependent on maintenance and traffic.

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers (PICP)

• Overview: Solid, impermeable concrete units designed with small openings or joints between them. These joints are filled with fine, open-graded aggregate, allowing water to infiltrate.
• Pros (Cost & Performance): Aesthetically versatile (many shapes, colors, patterns), highly durable, individual pavers can be replaced if damaged, high infiltration rates.
• Cons (Cost & Performance): Labor-intensive installation can lead to higher initial costs, joints require periodic replenishment of aggregate.
• Typical Applications: Driveways, patios, walkways, parking stalls, plazas.
• Material Cost: Approximately $3.00 – $7.00 per square foot for pavers; aggregate fill is additional but often minor.
• Installation Cost: Approximately $5.00 – $12.00 per square foot, highly dependent on pattern complexity and site prep.
• Typical Lifespan: 20-40 years, very durable.

Plastic Grid Pavers (Cellular Confinement Systems)

• Overview: Honeycomb-like grids made from recycled plastic or other polymers. The cells are filled with gravel, sand, or stabilized grass.
• Pros (Cost & Performance): Lightweight, easy to install (can be DIY for small areas), often uses recycled materials, good for grass reinforcement and gravel retention. Can be very cost-effective for certain applications.
• Cons (Cost & Performance): May not be suitable for high-traffic or heavy-load areas unless specifically engineered, grass-filled versions require ongoing landscape maintenance. Gravel can scatter.
• Typical Applications: Overflow parking, emergency access lanes, driveways, paths, erosion control.
• Material Cost: Approximately $1.50 – $4.00 per square foot for grids; fill material (gravel/soil/grass) is additional.
• Installation Cost: Approximately $2.00 – $6.00 per square foot.
• Typical Lifespan: 10-20+ years for the grid; lifespan of grass depends on maintenance.

Resin-Bound Paving

• Overview: Aggregates are mixed with a clear UV-stable resin and troweled onto a suitable base, creating a firm, highly porous surface with no loose stones.
• Pros (Cost & Performance): Smooth finish, aesthetically pleasing, highly permeable, good range of colors, SUDS compliant.
• Cons (Cost & Performance): Can be one of the more expensive pervious options, requires specialized installation.
• Typical Applications: Driveways, patios, footpaths, tree pits, pool surrounds.
• Material Cost: Approximately $5.00 – $10.00 per square foot (resin and aggregate).
• Installation Cost: Approximately $7.00 – $15.00 per square foot.
• Typical Lifespan: 15-25 years.

Cost Comparison

The table below provides estimated ranges. Note that “Total Estimated Cost” includes material and installation but does not initially include potential savings from reduced drainage infrastructure, which are discussed in the Lifecycle Cost Analysis section.

Pavement Type	Material Cost / sq ft	Installation Cost / sq ft	Total Est. Cost / sq ft	Notes on Cost Drivers & Variations
Pervious Options
Pervious Concrete	$2.50 – $6.00	$4.00 – $10.00	$6.50 – $16.00	Specialized mix design, certified installers, sub-base depth, project size. Higher end for complex designs or small projects.
Porous Asphalt	$2.00 – $5.00	$3.00 – $8.00	$5.00 – $13.00	Aggregate availability, oil prices, need for specialized laying techniques. Recycled content can lower material cost.
Permeable Interlocking Pavers (PICP)	$3.00 – $7.00	$5.00 – $12.00	$8.00 – $19.00	Paver style/complexity, pattern, labor intensity, edge restraints. Higher end for intricate designs and premium pavers.
Plastic Grid Pavers (Gravel/Grass)	$1.50 – $4.00	$2.00 – $6.00	$3.50 – $10.00	Type of grid, fill material chosen (gravel vs. soil & seed), site preparation. Gravel fill is generally cheaper than grass.
Resin-Bound Paving	$5.00 – $10.00	$7.00 – $15.00	$12.00 – $25.00	Quality of resin and aggregates, thickness, installer experience.
Traditional Options
Traditional Asphalt	$1.00 – $2.50	$2.00 – $5.00	$3.00 – $7.50	Oil prices, thickness required, project size. Does not include separate stormwater infrastructure costs.
Traditional Concrete	$1.50 – $3.50	$3.00 – $7.00	$4.50 – $10.50	Cement prices, reinforcement, finish, thickness. Does not include separate stormwater infrastructure costs.

Why the Cost Ranges?

The broad cost ranges exist due to several factors:

• Pervious Concrete: Material costs vary with aggregate type (recycled vs. virgin, local vs. imported) and any special admixtures or pigments. Installation is higher for smaller or complex jobs.
• Porous Asphalt: Similar to traditional asphalt, binder (bitumen) cost fluctuates. Use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) can reduce material costs.
• PICP: Basic pavers are cheaper; architectural or custom-colored pavers are more expensive. Labor significantly increases with intricate patterns.
• Plastic Grids: Material cost depends on grid strength and recycled content. Gravel fill is inexpensive; high-quality topsoil and turf for grass fill add cost.
• Resin-Bound: Cost is driven by the quality and type of resin (UV stability is key) and the choice of aggregates (rarer colors/types are pricier).

Factors Influencing Cost

Beyond the type of material, several elements significantly impact the overall project budget for pervious pavement systems:

1. Scale of Project: Larger projects (e.g., >10,000 sq ft) often benefit from economies of scale, reducing the per-square-foot cost due to efficient use of labor and equipment, and bulk material purchasing. Smaller projects may have higher mobilization costs per unit area.
2. Sub-base Requirements: This is a major cost component. Pervious systems require an open-graded aggregate sub-base (reservoir course) to store water before it infiltrates the soil. The depth of this sub-base depends on:
   • Soil Infiltration Rate: Clayey, poorly draining soils require a deeper sub-base (or underdrains) than sandy, well-draining soils. Geotechnical testing is crucial.
   • Frost Depth: In cold climates, the sub-base may need to extend below the frost line.
   • Design Storm: The volume of water the system is designed to handle.
   A deeper sub-base means more excavation, more aggregate material, and higher costs.
3. Local Labor Rates & Material Availability: Labor costs vary significantly by region. The availability of specialized contractors experienced in pervious pavement installation can also affect price. Proximity to quarries for aggregates and manufacturing plants for pavers or concrete components impacts material transportation costs.
4. Edge Restraints: Most pervious pavements, especially PICP and sometimes pervious concrete/asphalt, require robust edge restraints (e.g., concrete curbs, plastic or metal edging) to maintain structural integrity. These add to material and labor costs.
5. Complexity of Drainage Design: While pervious pavement itself manages water, some sites may require supplementary drainage elements like:
   • Underdrains: Perforated pipes within the sub-base to carry away excess water in poorly draining soils or direct it to other infiltration areas.
   • Observation Wells: For monitoring performance.
   • Infiltration Trenches or Raingardens: Integrated into the overall site design.
   These components add to design and installation expenses.
6. Site Accessibility and Preparation: Difficult site access can increase labor and equipment time. Extensive grading, removal of existing pavement, or soil stabilization needed before installation will add to the project cost.
7. Design Complexity: Simple rectangular areas are less expensive than installations with curves, intricate patterns (for PICP), or multiple slope changes.
8. Mobilization Costs: The cost for the contractor to bring equipment and personnel to the site. This is a larger percentage of the total cost for smaller projects.

When comparing pervious pavement to traditional systems, an LCCA often shows pervious options to be more cost-effective over a 20-30 year period, primarily due to savings on stormwater infrastructure.

Challenges and Considerations

While beneficial, pervious pavement has considerations:

• Soil Suitability: Not ideal for sites with very low-permeability clay soils directly beneath the pavement without an underdrain system or a significantly deep sub-base. High water tables can also be a concern.
• Slope Limitations: Best suited for relatively flat areas or gentle slopes (typically <5%). Steeper slopes can cause surface runoff before infiltration and potential erosion of sub-base materials.
• Load-Bearing Capacity: While pervious concrete and PICP can be designed for heavy traffic, some types (like plastic grids) are for light to moderate loads only. Standard pervious concrete and porous asphalt typically have slightly lower structural capacity than their conventional counterparts and may not be suitable for very high-volume highways or industrial areas with extremely heavy axle loads without specialized design.
• Clogging Potential: If not maintained, surface pores can clog with sediment, fines, and debris, reducing infiltration capacity. Proper design (e.g., avoiding runoff from unstabilized areas onto the pavement) and regular cleaning are essential.
• Winter Performance & Maintenance: In cold climates, sand should not be used for deicing as it will clog the pavement. Use minimal coarse salt or alternative deicers. Pervious pavements can actually reduce ice buildup because meltwater drains away. However, freeze-thaw cycling can be a concern if the system becomes saturated and freezes, though modern designs and proper sub-base construction mitigate this.
• Specialized Contractors: Installation, particularly for pervious concrete and resin-bound systems, requires specialized knowledge and experienced contractors, who may not be available in all areas or may charge a premium.

Case Studies: Pervious Pavement in Action (with Cost Insights)

(Note: These are illustrative examples. Actual project costs vary widely.)

Case Study 1: Commercial Parking Lot Retrofit

• Project: A 50,000 sq ft existing asphalt parking lot requiring resurfacing and improved stormwater management to meet new local codes.
• Traditional Option: Mill and overlay asphalt ($4/sq ft) + construct new underground detention system and bioswale ($150,000). Total: $200,000 (overlay) + $150,000 (drainage) = $350,000.
• Pervious Option: Replace with 50,000 sq ft of pervious concrete at $10/sq ft (including deeper sub-base, eliminating need for separate detention). Total: $500,000.
• Analysis: While the pervious option was $150,000 more initially, the old solution required losing 10 parking spaces for the bioswale. The pervious system allowed full use of the lot. The LCCA also showed that avoiding the long-term maintenance of the detention system and bioswale, plus potential stormwater fee credits, made the pervious option more favorable over 25 years. ROI was achieved by retaining full parking capacity and reduced long-term stormwater compliance costs.

Case Study 2: Residential Driveway

• Project: New 800 sq ft driveway for a home in an environmentally sensitive area.
• Traditional Concrete Cost: $8/sq ft = $6,400. City required an $3,000 dry well for runoff. Total: $9,400.
• PICP Option: $15/sq ft = $12,000. No separate dry well needed.
• Analysis: Initial cost for PICP was $2,600 higher. However, the homeowner valued the aesthetic appeal, groundwater recharge, and contribution to local watershed health. They also qualified for a $500 local government rebate for permeable paving. Net higher cost was $2,100, deemed acceptable for the environmental and aesthetic benefits.

Case Study 3: University Walkways

• Project: Replacing 10,000 sq ft of crumbling concrete walkways with a solution to reduce icing and improve campus aesthetics.
• Porous Asphalt Option: Chosen for its ability to reduce standing water and potential for quicker snowmelt/ice reduction due to drainage. Cost: $9/sq ft = $90,000.
• Savings Achieved: Reduced need for de-icing salts (material cost savings and reduced environmental impact), fewer slip-and-fall incidents reported in the first winter. The university also highlighted this as part of its sustainability initiatives, improving public perception. The cost was slightly higher than traditional concrete, but ROI included reduced winter maintenance labor/materials and enhanced safety.